Monday, 26 December 2016
Thursday, 3 November 2016
Thursday, 1 September 2016
Dear Members,
A token strike is called by the central trade
unions on 02/09/2016. Some of the federations working in Ordnance Factories are
also participating in this call.
On behalf of the Central Executive of NDNGS Association,
all members are requested to not participate in the strike call please.
(with profound regards)
(D.
K. Chowdhury) (Kamlesh
Kumar)
President/CE General Secretary/CE
Saturday, 18 June 2016
Saturday, 11 June 2016
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Sunday, 10 April 2016
To,
All CE
office bearers,
Zonal
Secretaries,
Branch
Chairman/Secretaries
Sub: Submission of membership
on 30/04/2016
Dear Brothers,
NDNGSA has started
his glorious journey with the blessing of Late Hari Jee. The journey has
started just now and there is a long way to go.
As you all are aware that one tenure of 5 years
recognition from MoD has been successfully completed and association has
performed his moral duties in the leadership of our seniors. Our presence have
also been acknowledged by the OFB and MoD and appreciated by them.
Once again time has come to define our destiny and make
NDNGSA as biggest association in OFB.
Friends, this is very victorious time for us. Lets work little hard to
achieve the goal set by Late Hari Jee. It should be our real tribute for him by
crowning NDNGSA as number one association.
Please share our achievements of last five years in the
leadership of our seniors and great support of every prestigious members which
will sure help in achieving the highest membership.
All senior members, office bearers, CE members, Branch
Chairman and branch Secretaries are requested to make your best effort for
splendid destiny and submit ever highest membership. All zonal secretaries are requested to liaison
with branch secretaries of factories in
their zone and must provide full assistance to increase membership.
With best of
luck, keep going hard ………
lQj dh gn gSa ogkW rd
dh dqN fu’kku jgsa A
pys pyks fd tghW rd ;s
vkleku jgs AA
;s D;k mBk;s dne vkSj
vk x;h eafty A
etk rks rc gS fd iSjks
es dqN Fkdku jgs AA
with regards yours
brotherly
Kamlesh Kumar
GS/CE
Saturday, 2 April 2016
Letter to OFB for stopping of LTC recovery
No. NDNGSA/CE/Cr-6/2016 Date:
30/03/2016
The DGOF & Chairman,
Ordnance Factory Board,
10-A, S. K. Bose Road, Kolkata
Kind Attn: Shri A. S. Bhatnagar, Dir/NG
Sub: Recovery against LTC claim
Ref: (i) Dopt F. No.
31011/412007-Estt.(A) Dtd. 20/04/2010
(ii) Dopt F. No. 31011/3/2015-Estt.(A-IV) Dtd. 01/04/2015
Respected Sir,
I have been
directed by the Central Executive committee of NDNGS Association to bring the
following facts to your kind notice and favourable action please.
1. The
Union Government has extended LTC facilities in relaxation of CCS (LTC) Rules-1988
to travel by air to North East Region (Guwahati, Gangtok), Srinagar and Andaman
& Nicobar Islands to develop tourism. A good mass of employees from OFB organization
had availed this facility from the year 2008 positively. Whereas, at this late
stage, Test Audit group has declared the LTC final claims as inadmissible, as
the LTC air travels were proceeded contrary to the provisions of Min.of Finance
OM.No.19024/1/2009/E.IV Dated-16.09.2010. Accordingly, letter has been issued
to Chargeman and JWMs in some Ordnance factories, to remit the total amount
with penal interest.
2. Detailed
instruction and procedure to be followed have been issued in last year vides
Dopt order cited under reference (ii). Even though in para 3 of this Dopt
order, Govt himself pointed out the system failure by quoting “At the same time it has been noticed
that administrative authorities have also shown laxity and due to diligence on
their part could have prevented such situations from arising.”
3. Further, it is
to be noted that, the LTC applicants were even availed the advance amount only after due verification of the
tickets by the concerned authorities, simultaneously if the Air Tickets were rejected prior to the
release of advances, the individuals would have cancelled their LTC
journey. It is a very transparent fact that, the LTC journeys were preceded
through Air India only, boarding passes submitted may be verified in this regard.
After a lapse of more than 3 years, the test audit group has declared the
claims inadmissible which was settled and passed by PC of A (Fys) after
rigorous scrutiny of claims. This move is created lot of unrest and panic
situation among the Govt. servant.
4. MoD vide ID No. 11/1/2013-D(Civ-II) dtd.
24/07/2015 has taken up the matter with Dopt. for a decision on the LTC claim
submitted by the defence civilian employee where the air ticket have not been
purchased in accordance with the Govt. instruction due to lack of awareness. In
this regard MoD itself asked for the details of such cases from the OFB with
suitable comments to forward dopt for consideration of one time relaxation. In
the same line, OFB vide Instruction No. 612/A/A(Pt. II) dtd.06/08/2015 has asked
to factories and matter is between MoD
and Dopt for
consideration.
5. Honorable
CAT, Jabalpur in his decision against the recovery in LTC had pointed out the
slackness of administration and directed to consider LTC claim of the applicant
by relaxing the condition regarding purchase of ticket from the airline or
authorized agencies mentioned in Min. of Finance OM.No.19024/1/2009/E.IV
Dated-16.09.2010.
6. Apart
from the above, some concerned authority is following the procedure that, not
to sanction the LTC advance amount unless air ticket is produced.
Salaried/Waged employees were not in a position to bear the huge advance amount
need for ticket bookings. It is requested that concerned authority may ask to
give advance amount to make enable to Govt. servant to purchase air ticket.
Considering the merit of this
appeal, your good office is requested not to re-open the settled cases since
the OFB/MoD itself is seeking one time relaxation for their employee and
requested to Dopt for a favorable decision.
Submitted
for kind consideration and favorable action please.
(Kamlesh
Kumar)
General
Secretary/CE
Copy:
The Sr. General Manager/General Manager
- for kind information with
request to stop the recovery if any till Dopt’s final outcome.
Page
02 of 02
Wednesday, 9 March 2016
SUBMITTED MEMORANDUM TO DEFENCE SECRETARY ON 09.03.2016
No. NDNGSA/CE/Cr-5/2016 Date: 09/03/2016
Defence Secretary
Ministry of Defence
Govt. of India
Sub:
Submission of memorandum against the 7th CPC report
Recommendation of 7th CPC
with reference to almost cadre is very unfortunate, unsatisfactory and
disappointing for central Govt. Employees except a very few in top levels along
with some other specific cadres. It can be said simply that belated merger of
DA in basic pay has been done by this pay commission nothing else. Hence it
needs complete review and correction. Following is submitted for your kind
perusal and necessary correction please.
It is desirable as principle to be
followed as mentioned in page 55 of chapter 4.1 of seventh CPC report itself.
But unfortunately it is not seen in pay fixation of Master craftsman and
Chargeman. Both are having distinct nature of job, responsibilities and
qualification which is required to be reflected in their pay fixation according
to the principle illustrated in chapter 4.1.
1) Regarding
Upgradation of Chargeman cadre: In any organization, functional
and remuneration hierarchy is framed for a harmonious, disciplined and
passionate working environment. Hierarchy is also maintained in all grades
available in Ordnance factory. However, from 5th CPC, functional
hierarchy is maintained between Master Craftsman and Chargeman while
remuneration of master craftsman is lifted to the same level as Chargeman. In
Ordnance Factory, CM is executing works of all category viz. production,
planning, procurement, designing, development, inspection, plant operation,
maintenance and supervision of all category of Industrial worker including Master
Craftsman. It is very unpractical to supervise and direct to Master Craftsman
on shop floor, drawing the same pay.
5th CPC and 6th
CPC both has recommended higher pay scale to Chargeman(supervisory cadre) than
Master Craftsman (Industrial cadre) and regretted the pay parity of Master
craftsman demanded by the federations. Later on, due to cadre restructuring of
industrial employees, Master craftsman was upgraded in the grade pay 4200/-
PB-2 of 6th CPC which was originally granted to Chargeman in 6th
CPC.
Since Master Craftsman is a feeder
post to Chargeman and both are having distinct job responsibilities at shop
floor and keeping in mind of the qualification of chargeman also, MoD is
requested to consider our demand to place Chargeman in level-7 in pay matrix of
7th CPC report, one step above to Master Craftsman due to functional
role in hierarchy, to encourage the moral of 12000 chargeman of this
organization as well as to maintain shop floor cultural of good governance.
2) Indexes of levels of existing grade pay
4200 (level-6), 4600 (level-7) and 4800 (level-8) in the pay matrix are having
identical pay slab, thus there will be no any financial benefit at the time of
promotion/MACP by fixation from existing level to next level of promotion/MACP.
Promotion/MACP among these three levels, fixation will be just equal to annual
increment only. This is required to be corrected in such a way that promotional/MACP
fixation should have higher growth than annual increment. It can be seen in Annexure
-I
MoD is requested to kindly consider
fixation above two slabs in next level of promotional hierarchy at the time of
promotion/MACP.
3) Risk Allowances for
All the cadre those are working in hazardous(Explosive manufacturing) in
Ordnance Factories irrespective of Cadre- Ordnance Factories are
manufacturing Explosives and other product which has got many Health Hazard and
cause many accidents during the manufacturing process. At present Industrial
employees are granted risk Allowances only.
Therefore this association suggests
extending the same risk allowances to the entire cadre including Gazetted
cadres those are involved in manufacturing process of Hazardous substances in
ordnance Factories.
This Allowance may be fixed in
R2H3 in the RHA matrix in the 7th CPC recommendation
4) It is well known fact that day to day
basis, there is a hike in a cost of land, material required for building of
house, resulting increase in house rent accordingly. But the same time seventh
CPC recommended reduction of house rent allowance. Status quo for HRA should
remain as per 6th CPC i.e. 30%, 20% and 10%.
5) MACP should be minimum 4 after every 8
year from the date of Inception in the service and in the hierarchy of the
post. In case of promotion through Limited departmental competitive
examination, inception in service must be taken in account for the purpose
of MACP.
6) Status quo for all advances and
allowances may be maintained as per 6th CPC with appropriate hike.
7) Higher education is today’s need of
country hence it is the request of the Association that CEA should be given for
higher education i.e. upto Degree level. Furthermore it is also requested that
NOC for higher education should be given to Group B non gazzeted and gazzeted
also.
8) Reimbursement of CEA and daily allowances
during deputation should be reimbursed without vouchers/bills.
9) Family planning Allowances may be
continued.
10) Special Compensatory (Hill Area) Allowance
may be continued and may be placed in R2H3 in the RHA matrix.
11) Hard station allowance may be enhanced @
25% of basic pay to encourage people working at hard station and are getting less
salary than who are enjoying metro.
12) Chapter 4.2 of seventh CPC report is
related with determination of minimum pay of central Govt. employee. In this
chapter at Page 65, Seventh CPC published a calculation table for determination
of minimum pay but we are very sorry to say that price list of some essential
goods mentioned in this list is not relevant. It is also pertinent to mention here that
dependent parents are not included as family member. Hence it is requested to
kindly reconsider the minimum pay of central Govt. employee with appropriate
manner.
13) Duty and responsibilities of service
providing and production sector are totally different.
It is not agreeable to provide same
pay structure for the both.
Submitted please.
Your
sincerely Your
Sincerely
D. K.
Choudhary (Kamlesh
Kumar)
President/CE General
Secretary/CE
Sunday, 6 March 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)